|





| |
Session 1 - What is Ethics
Slideshow
|
|
An Ethics School
Kondo (1990) gives a vivid account of everyday life on the shop floor of a
small family-owned sweet factory in Tokyo… she is sent to an ethics school
with two other employees… Here is a brief description of the activities before
breakfast each day. The day started at 5 am with a call to rise. Waking up late
was regarded as unnatural, indulgent, selfish, slovenly. Cleaning came next and
was a standard ingredient of spiritual education. Each cleaning task was to be
performed with a glad heart. The counsellors would lead the group in chants of
‘Fight!’ as they hosed down the toilets, emptied the tins of sanitary
napkins, and scrubbed the floors. After cleaning they jogged to the statue of
the founder and after a rousing shout of good morning, they were lectured on an
inspirational theme. A tape recorder played the national anthem as the flags
were raised. They then had shouting practice where they were required to scream
greetings at the top of their voices or shout ‘I am the sun of ‘x’
company. I will make ‘x’ company number one in Japan.’ Every word was
rewarded by shouts of encouragement from the others and rounds of applause. The
idea was to inculcate receptiveness and a willingness to greet and appreciate
others and eliminate resistance toward responding positively towards authority.
They ran for at least 1.5 miles as a rehearsal for the 7.5 kilometre marathon
scheduled for the end of the programme. Shouting and chanting was required
during running. Speed was not the issue, it was more important to finish and not
give up. Neglect of the body was seen as lack of appreciation of the gift of
life. Ritual ablution ceremonies with cold water, in order to give thanks to
water, followed… morning classes were for reciting in unison phrases like ‘Hardship
is the gateway to happiness’ and ‘Other people are our mirrors’. Students
would be given instructions on how to bow at the proper angle, have a pleasant
facial expression, and use the appropriate language level.
F. Wilson 1999, Organizational Behaviour: A Critical Introduction,
Oxford: 143
In small groups, discuss this approach to education. Does it teach ‘ethics’?
Is it ‘ethical’?
|
|
Caltex and Apartheid - abridged from Velasquez: 70-3
|
| The apartheid system legalised racial discrimination in all aspects of life.
Apartheid deprived the entire black population of all political and Civil
Rights: they could not vote, could not hold significant political office, could
not be unionised nor bargain collectively, had no right to freedom of assembly,
nor right to habeas corpus [i.e they could be held prisoner without the State
having to identify the reasons for detention]. |
| During the 1980s, at the very height of the apartheid regime, Caltex, an
American oil company jointly owned by Texaco and Standard Oil, operated several
oil refineries in South Africa. It had repeatedly expanded its refinery
operations. Each expansion gave the South African government greater access to
the petroleum it desperately needed. The South African economy relied on oil for
25% of its energy needs, and South African law required refineries to set aside
some of their oil for the government. In addition, stiff corporate taxes ensured
that a high percentage of Caltex’s annual revenues went to the government. |
| Many stockholders of Texaco and Standard Oil bitterly opposed allowing Caltex
to continue its operations in South Africa. A leader of the dissident
stockholders stated why they should leave: |
Nonwhites in South Africa are rightless persons in the land of their
birth… the [black South African] cannot vote, cannot own land, and may not
have his family with him unless he has government permission… by investing
in South Africa, American companies inevitably strengthen the status quo of
white supremacy… the leasing of a computer, the establishment of a new
plant, the selling of supplies to the military all have political overtones…
|
|
The management of Caltex, however, did not feel that it should stop selling
petroleum products to the South African government nor that it should leave
South Africa. The company acknowledge that its operations provided a strategic
resource for the racist South African government. Nevertheless, the company
claimed its operations ultimately helped black South Africans, particularly the
company's own black workers toward whom the company had special
responsibilities. Opposing one of the many resolutions that stockholders
repeatedly put forward, Caltex’s managers stated:
|
Texaco believes the continuation of Caltex operations in South Africa is
in the best interest of employees of all races in South Africa… in
management opinion, if Caltex was to withdraw from South Africa in an
attempt to achieve political changes in that country, as the proposal
directs, such withdrawal would endanger prospects for the future of all
Caltex employees in South Africa regardless of race. We are convinced that
the resulting dislocation and hardship would fall most heavily on the
nonwhite communities. In this regard, and contrary to the implications of
the stockholders, Caltex employment policies include equal pay for equal
work and the same level of benefit plans for all employees as well as a
continuing and successful programme to advance employees to positions of
responsibility on the basis of ability, not race.
|
|
Among those who vigorously supported the resolutions asking American
companies to leave South Africa was Desmond Tutu. To say that American companies
should stay in South Africa because they pay higher wages and provided an
economic benefit, Tutu said, was to, "… attempt to polish my chains and
make them more comfortable. I want to cut my chains and cast them away."
|
|
Questions
In what ways can the following five ethical systems be used to argue the case
of Caltex in South Africa?
a) Utilitarian argument(s)
b) Argument(s) based on notions of Justice
c) Argument(s) based on Rights
d) Ethics of Care
e) An Ethic of Virtue
Who are the stakeholders in this situation? What might be argued from each of
their different perspectives?
Is it appropriate for a company to become involved in political matters?
What is the ‘business case’ for Caltex pulling out of South Africa?
|
Top
|
|